Judith Snow |
The great Judith Snow, a disability activist from Canada,
changed my understanding, not only of politics, but of social life as well, when
she described herself as a “multi-bodied being.” She has extremely limited mobility, and
requires the use of other bodies—to help her eat and attend to bodily
functions, to make her art, and to attend to all the duties and requirements of
speaking and advocating internationally.
She points out that we all are multi-bodied beings, but that some people
live in a state of grace that allows the essential interpenetration of our
lives to be recognized and understood.
This lesson was remembered in the delightful 24 hour visit
we had with my niece, her husband, and their family during our visit in and
around Whitefish. I had not seen Kelsey
for a number of years. Actually, I saw
her very little as she was growing up.
My brother (her father) and his family lived in Nevada; we lived in
Detroit. It was hard to make our paths
cross with any regularity. I kept track
of her life through the family rumor mill, but I had never met her husband,
Justin, and only knew from a distance about their travels to Australia and
Argentina. I had followed on Facebook
the progress of her pregnancy and the birth, a few months ago, of their son
Jasper.
So we were very pleased to receive a phone call from Kelsey,
who had been tipped off by my mother, that we would be in the area. We met for breakfast, but the visit stretched
into the next day and touched me on several levels.
Babies, of course, are the exemplar multi-bodied
beings. They utterly depend on the
actions of others to move them, feed them, and ensure their safety and needs
are met. Kelsey and Justin move in sync
in this task, taking turns carrying Jasper on his or her back. When Kelsey wants to go out into Whitefish
Lake to wade and swim with us, Justin stays behind, Jasper in the carrier on his
back, while he wades up to his knees in the water, then sways gently as he
watches us move into deeper water. They
are a smooth parenting team, getting the diapers, cleaning the baby, toting the
inevitable bag of baby paraphernalia.
Both Wes and I remark how different it was in our parents’ and our
generation. Dads were commonly quite
distant from moment-by-moment needs of the baby. Kelsey and Justin very much were Jasper’s
extensions into the world—but they were also that for each other.
When we met Justin’s mother, Carolyn, the lesson was brought
home in a few more ways. It was very
sweet that Justin and Kelsey offered us a place to stay, to wash our clothes,
and generally catch up. After attending
to various chores (getting a brake job on Wes’ bike, buying Wes new shoes, and
replacing my worn-out bicycle gloves), Kelsey and Justin pick us up, take us
swimming in Whitefish Lake, cook us delicious chicken brats, and then take us
to his family home.
The house is in between Kalispell and Whitefish. It is a lovely house that the family designed
and built in 1988. Carolyn says, “We
had an open plan before it was even called that.” We are invited to stay in Justin’s boyhood
room. This tickles us to no end, as we
look at his award for scholastic achievement at the age of 10, find out that he
was a great soccer fan, and see his smiling schoolboy pictures from the age of
about 12. This is truly an unfair
advantage for visiting relatives.
We discover two things during this visit that remind us how
important we are all to each other.
Carolyn, to our great delight, is the union president of her bargaining
unit for the Forest Service employees in the Kalispell region. What a relief for all us--who normally have
to watch what we say in this part of the country-- to talk about the way that
his country is set up, more and more, to benefit the few at the expense of the
many. (How did we get to the point that expressing any negative analysis of
capitalism is seen as dangerous and unacceptable?)
We talk about the necessity of solidarity…about how we need
the support of other people to balance the scales in a capitalist society. Without other bodies, without other strengths,
none of us stand a chance against the oppressive structures built into this
economic system.
Wes, particularly, revels in this discussion with
Carolyn. We realize, later, how much we
have been self-censoring our views during our travels. We spend a lot of time disabusing people of
their negative views of Detroit (tough work now that Detroit’s bankruptcy is
constantly in the news.) Even though
most people agree with my comments about the “system” no longer serving the needs
of its people, we don’t go much further than that.
Also, the Snyder family is facing a situation that will come
to all of us, sooner or later. Justin’s
dad, Carolyn’s husband, Chuck, is facing the debilitations of a Parkinson’s
like syndrome. People in the disability
rights community have a term, “Temporarily Able Bodied,” (TAB’s), which should
move into more common usage. We are all
TAB’s. It is a common human experience
to require the assistance of others to live our lives. First of all, we require the work of others
to feed ourselves, build our roads, construct our bikes. I haven’t the slightest idea how I would feed
myself if I had to do it from seed to feed.
Could I make my own clothes?...Maybe…but I sure as heck couldn’t make my
own cloth. I utterly depend on
the work of other bodies to make my life possible.
That our culture doesn’t recognize this is ridiculous. In fact, we tend to participate in a mass
delusion about our individualism. This
view of rugged individualism is extremely prominent in the West. It is not unusual for people to say, in
person, or in the newspapers, that the only responsibility a person has is for
themselves and their immediate families.
Until we each build our own roads, sewers, and schools, those statements
are laughable.
But it so much more profound that these usual
inanities. One of the innovations of the
disability rights movement is making obvious how much each of us depends upon a
circle of support. Culture exists to
provide that support for each of us, whether through the structure of a family, a church, a neighborhood...or a government. We can’t do it alone…ever. We don’t do it alone… ever. We just lie to ourselves about independent we
are.
A circle of support makes this true fact obvious and
discuss-able. It says through action
that humans are by nature and by necessity multi-bodied beings. We require each other to live. As we go through our lives, those needs
change, but the need never changes. When
each of us, whether babies or elders, mated or alone, travel through life, we
do it through a necessary and vital interpenetration into each other’s
lives. A wise society recognizes this
and makes these structures visible, accessible, and acceptable.
As we have seen, over and over, in the various situations of
our family and friends, disease, disaster, and bad luck are constant human
companions. We need other bodies/other
beings to keep us alive, to fill in our gaps, to add strength, and power, and
joy where there would otherwise be weakness, emptiness, or foolishness. We are, always and inevitably, multi-bodied
beings who exist through and because of other people, who create and support
everything we need to survive.
**********
Posted from Chinook, MT
I've been reading a book called "Singing Out," an oral history of "folk" music in the U.S. It reminds me of what I have read in many labor histories and in books like Howard Zinn's "People's History." That is, it has been labeled dangerous to speak ill of capitalism in the USA for many, many decades, well over 100 years. The danger is relatively mild today compared to the 1950s or the WWI period. Not that we shouldn't be concerned and not that we should not speak out against the ills of capitalism--an economic system that requires massive poverty so that a few can prosper.
ReplyDeleteI appreciate your comments on TAB people, a term I have learned while working with disability rights activists in Bend, Oregon.
I think you over generalize when you say that the idea of "rugged individualism" is extremely prominent in the west. It is extremely prominent in the rural west, just as I found it to be extremely prominent in upstate New York, upstate Michigan, and don't get me started on the Upper Peninsula. It is in rural America where this notion holds strong. There are plenty of people in the west who understand the importance of community and believe it should take precedence. Most of them live in more urban areas, which is also the case in the Midwest, east and even the southern US. Political views in Detroit are certainly different from those in Nauganee, MI, which we found to be a pretty conservative little burg...yet one that still had a great little progressive coffee shop.
Here in Canada, even here in generally more conservative Alberta, we find a hybrid sort of thing where people simultaneously adhere to a notion of individualism while supporting the idea of community through public health, public debate, etc. The differences between Canada and the US are far greater than the differences between the western US and the Midwest or the east. Obviously, the south and southwest are more conservative than other parts of the US. But even Montana, for all its "rugged individualist" notions, has a sense of populism that often leans left of center, though not as left of center as most of us would prefer.
Loved reading this post, Shaun! It was great seeing you guys. I hope we'll get to see you again sometime soon!
ReplyDeleteThanks for reading and responding to my blogs. I don't mean to imply that this is the first time that speaking ill of capitalism was dangerous. I think my point is that this is the greatest inhibition I have seen in my lifetime, matched with the most egregious excesses and damages from capitalism. The more damaging capitalism becomes, the more silence about it is enforced.
ReplyDeleteI also think you are right when you say that "rugged individualism" is not just a western philosophy, but apparent throughout rural US. As a person born and raised in Wyoming, it was constant, even though I was raised in the most union friendly and Democratic city in the state.
After years in Detroit, it is a bit of shock to hear and read the most retrograde vitriol. I think the little pockets of progressivism in Montana are vastly outnumbered by libertarianism and right wing fundamentalism.
Also, I am confused as to where you are. Do you now live in Canada? I thought you lived in Eugene, OR. One of my little jokes is that one of the great things about living in Detroit is that it is right next to a civilized country. I think that there is a lot that Canada does so much better than US.
At any rate, I really love that you are reading the blog and spending time thinking and writing about.
btw. Thanks for the correction on Jasper. I corrected my blog to make it Jasper, Alberta. It really is a beautiful spot.
From the road, in Glendive, MT...on the edge of the oil boom country...
Shaun